As a pat on the back to our firm and its wonderful employees, Fein Such is a proud recipient of the Alfred P. Sloan Awards for Business Excellence in Workplace Flexibility. The Sloan Awards recognize organizations that are dedicated to making work “work” for both the employer and the employees by creating effective and flexible workplaces that meet the needs of the 21st century.
30 Mayıs 2012 Çarşamba
Fein Such Awarded for Excellence in Workplace Flexibility
As a pat on the back to our firm and its wonderful employees, Fein Such is a proud recipient of the Alfred P. Sloan Awards for Business Excellence in Workplace Flexibility. The Sloan Awards recognize organizations that are dedicated to making work “work” for both the employer and the employees by creating effective and flexible workplaces that meet the needs of the 21st century.
The No Banker Left Behind Act
To all Taxpayers - the proposed $700,000,000,000.00 (yeah, that is a real big number - looks much more menacing with all the zeros spelled out) bailout represents a cost of $2,310.23 per each man, woman and child in US. For a family of 4, that amounts to $9240.92 of money our government currently does not have going to a group of institutions that not only have made horrendous investment decisions, but already profited from them.
Per the International Herald Tribune December15, 2006:
NEW YORK: Lehman Brothers Holdings and Bear Stearns, the Wall Street firms most dependent on the fixed-income market, crowned their best year with record fourth-quarter earnings, bolstered by corporate bonds and derivatives.
Profit at Bear Stearns rose 38 percent to a record $562.8 million, and Lehman's earnings rose 22 percent to $1 billion in the quarter ended Nov. 30. While both beat analysts' estimates, they lagged behind Goldman Sachs Group, which reported a better- than-expected 93 percent jump in quarterly profit this week.
If I were going to be investing $9240.92 this week, it would certainly not be in financial institutions. While some sort of government action may be necessary, an un-critiqued $700,000,000,000.00 blank check cannot be the answer. Call, write to, or email your Congressperson. Regardless of your beliefs, demand that they take the time to analyze the No Banker Left Behind Act. Congress should give as much attention to this bill as you would to you investing $2,310.23 in the current market for every member of your family.
To reach your Represenatives in the House of Representatives:
https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml
To reach your Senator:
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
A Different Approach to $700,000,000,000.00 "Bailout"
I can't seem to stop reading about this "bailout" or No Banker Left Behind Act. It is like watching a car wreck in slow motion - you would do something if you could, but you don't have the power to stop it.
Then, I came across the below that I think offers a better way to look at a bailout. Apparently, Sweden found itself in a strikingly similar bank credit crisis back in 1992: "The country was so far in the hole in 1992 — after years of imprudent regulation, short-sighted economic policy and the end of its property boom — that its banking system was, for all practical purposes, insolvent." Sound familiar?
How Sweden Solved Its Bank Crisis - NYTimes.com: "But Sweden took a different course than the one now being proposed by the United States Treasury. And Swedish officials say there are lessons from their own nightmare that Washington may be missing.
Sweden did not just bail out its financial institutions by having the government take over the bad debts. It extracted pounds of flesh from bank shareholders before writing checks. Banks had to write down losses and issue warrants to the government."
The article goes on to say that Sweden spent about the same percent of its GDP (4-5%) on is 1996 bailout of the banks, but took equity back so the out of pocket to the government (ie the taxpayers) was really only 2%.
I am thinking I am liking the Swedish plan much better than take all my money, do what you like, have no oversight, and no real change plan I see now - oh, and I really love that we have to do it NOW or life as we know it will end, when as we know it is already long past.
It's A GO! New Jersey Combines Medicaid Waivers For Seniors & Adults With Physical Disabilities
This is great news and hopefully will proivded needed efficiencies and consolidated review of services.
Category: Elder Law
Haven't Paid NJ Taxes? Now Might Be the Time
Courtesy of JH Cohn:
New Jersey Enacts Tax Amnesty Program
"New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine has signed a bill creating a 45-day New Jersey state tax amnesty period that will end no later than June 15, 2009. Presumably the program will begin on or about May 1, allowing the New Jersey Division of Taxation some time after the April 15 filing deadline to gear up for the program.
Under the program, taxpayers who pay outstanding state tax liabilities for tax returns due on or after January 1, 2002 and prior to February 1, 2009, plus one-half of interest owed as of May 1, 2009, will not have to pay the other half of the interest owed, nor will they be liable for collections costs or civil or criminal penalties. Taxpayers under criminal investigation for a state tax matter are ineligible for the program. On the other hand, taxpayers involved with civil tax audits are eligible.
Similar to the most recent New Jersey tax amnesty program conducted in 2002, a five percent "amnesty eligible" penalty will be imposed after the amnesty period concludes on any additional taxes found due by a taxpayer that were not paid during the amnesty period for a tax period falling under the amnesty program."
26 Mayıs 2012 Cumartesi
Changing your 529 Investment - Not so Fast
I learned something new this week - 529 plans (Qualified Tuition Plans under Internal Revenue Code Section 529) only allow one (1) investment change a year. So, if you reallocated in February, you can't do it again in September. Now, prior to the recent market turmoil, I don't know if many parents gave it much thought. With the recent market turmoil, I am sure the performance of 529 Plans has become a priority conversation topic at kitchen tables round the country. One possible solution offered - tranfer the 529 Plan to a plan operated in a different state, so you can have "new" investment options.
It's A GO! New Jersey Combines Medicaid Waivers For Seniors & Adults With Physical Disabilities
This is great news and hopefully will proivded needed efficiencies and consolidated review of services.
Category: Elder Law
Silver Alert Legislation Making its Way Through Trenton
A good and reasonable new law to help families of those suffering from dementia and other diseases is making its way through Trenton.
Baroni Silver Alert Legislation Approved by Committee New Jersey Senator Bill Baroni NJ District 14: "The Senate Law and Public Safety Committee approved bill S1551/S1844, establishing a “Silver Alert System” for missing people who are believed to be suffering from dementia or other cognitive impairments."
"This emergency alert plan is based on the “Amber Alert” used by State Police to locate missing children. The alerts will include a description of the missing person and other information deemed appropriate by the State and local law enforcement agencies."
Prevent Identity Theft
HOW TO PREVENT IDENTITY THEFT - Courtesy of Valeria and Carolyn Messina of http://www.messinamortgageinfo.com/
What is Identity Theft?
Identity theft is the unlawful use of another person’s identification, and may take many forms. Common methods of identity theft include credit card or other financial institution fraud, phone or utility services theft, and the taking of government documents or benefits.
Unfortunately, every day thieves are finding new ways of using the identities of their victims.
Identity thieves typically get this information from:
Stolen wallets and purses
Stolen mail
Unauthorized access to computers
Telemarketing scams
Sharing of passwords
Fraudulent e-mails
Dumpster diving (searching through your trash can)
How can I keep my identity safe?
Check your credit reports and scores on a regular basis.
Shred any documents and mail that contain your Social Security Number (SSN), account numbers and other personal information.
Don’t carry your Social Security card in your wallet or purse. Memorize your SSN.
Check financial statements and bills as soon as they arrive. Report any unauthorized transactions to the companies immediately.
Lock your mailbox. Deposit outgoing mail containing checks in a postal box—don’t leave it sitting in your unlocked mailbox or apartment lobby.
At home, secure sensitive information like bank and credit card statements, insurance records, etc., where they can’t be seen by visitors or workers.
At teller machines (ATMs), shield the PIN keypad while entering credit and debit card passwords.
Try to keep an eye on your credit card when you give it to a merchant or waiter.
When you order new checks, look out for them. Make sure they are delivered to a locked mailbox.
Change your passwords regularly and do not share them with anyone.
Nver respond to requests by phone or e-mail for personal information, no matter how urgent the request seems. Find the number of the company online and call to ask if the request is legitimate.
Don’t give out personal information on the phone, through the mail, or on the Internet unless you’ve initiated the call or you are absolutely sure you know the company or person you’re dealing with.
Read your bank’s privacy notice so that you understand how it uses your information for marketing. If you don’t want to get preapproved credit offers, call 888-5OPT-OUT (567-8688) to stop them.
Be careful about giving away information about yourself. Question why a business needs your SSN, mother’s maiden name or other information.
Monitor your mail for missed bills, credit card statements and other mail that you expected. A missing bill might mean that a thief has taken over your account and changed your billing address.
Investigate mysterious purchases, charges, bills or collection calls immediately. If you receive a credit card you didn’t apply for, find a strange charge on your credit card or get calls or letters from debt collectors about bills you don’t recognize, call the companies immediately to address the problem.
Question credit offers. If you know you have good credit but your application for a new credit card is denied, it could signal identity theft. When you are denied credit, you can get a free copy of your credit report from the credit bureau used by the lender.
Haven't Paid NJ Taxes? Now Might Be the Time
Courtesy of JH Cohn:
New Jersey Enacts Tax Amnesty Program
"New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine has signed a bill creating a 45-day New Jersey state tax amnesty period that will end no later than June 15, 2009. Presumably the program will begin on or about May 1, allowing the New Jersey Division of Taxation some time after the April 15 filing deadline to gear up for the program.
Under the program, taxpayers who pay outstanding state tax liabilities for tax returns due on or after January 1, 2002 and prior to February 1, 2009, plus one-half of interest owed as of May 1, 2009, will not have to pay the other half of the interest owed, nor will they be liable for collections costs or civil or criminal penalties. Taxpayers under criminal investigation for a state tax matter are ineligible for the program. On the other hand, taxpayers involved with civil tax audits are eligible.
Similar to the most recent New Jersey tax amnesty program conducted in 2002, a five percent "amnesty eligible" penalty will be imposed after the amnesty period concludes on any additional taxes found due by a taxpayer that were not paid during the amnesty period for a tax period falling under the amnesty program."
23 Mayıs 2012 Çarşamba
I Don't Like Working as an Accountant at the Big 4, Maybe I Should Go to Law School?

One of our readers asked whether we were aware of people leaving the Big 4 to take nice jobs. Of course. But it depends on what you call a nice job, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder. This is a good topic, so we will dedicate a few separate posts to it, exploring different avenues of departure from the Big 4.
One very smart/dumb move that a lot of Big 4 accountants make is to leave the Big 4 to go to law school. A few people we know worked at the Big 4 for a couple years, then went to law school, and are now doing pretty well for themselves at big law firms or having started their own business/tax law firm. For example, one guy we know went to law school after getting his CPA license, worked at a big law firm for a couple years negotiating big deals, and then left to start his own practice providing CFO and general counsel services to start-ups and high-net-worth individuals.
But law school and lawyering is definitely not for everybody. Although, if you are going to spend the rest of your days punching numbers in a dark cubicle at the Big 4 anyway, you might want to consider upgrading to a big law firm. Let's compare some of the high-level differences between entry-level lawyers versus entry-level accountants:
Lawyers v. Accountants
1. Starting Salary. This is by far one of the most obvious differences between Big Accounting and Big Law. Starting salaries at a big law firm are double and triple what they are at the Big 4, with most Big law firms in the big cities paying $145,000 to $160,000 to its starting lawyers, and those salaries usually go up $5,000 to $10,000 each year after that. On top of that, after the first year, starting lawyers are usually paid a year-end bonus of anywhere from $20,000 to $60,000. Of course, the recession has rained on that parade a little, and many law firms froze or lowered salaries this past year by 10-20%. Also bear in mind coming out of law school you will have lots of debt, maybe even as much as $100,000 in school loans unless daddy is paying for it or you go to a less-expensive state-run school like U. of Texas or a church-run school like BYU.
2. Your Own Office. Lawyers usually get their own office right out of law school at a big law firm. And we are not talking about a glorified cubicle with a door and four walls that go almost to the ceiling. We are talking a real office with a real solid desk and and other furniture, and a nice view of something spectacular: the city skyline, a famous bridge, a body of water, or in Los Angeles, a nice big freeway.

Accountant cubicle:

Lawyer office (note the large volumes of boxes and papers everywhere -- we'll get to that later):

3. Work. Junior accountants in general spend all day hunched over a laptop preparing spreadsheets and looking for numbers. Junior attorneys spend all day at their desks drafting agreements, or researching cases and writing memos, or going through boxes and boxes of documents looking for smoking guns (see the boxes in the picture above). It's tough to objectively compare whether the work of junior attorneys is any less tedious than the work of junior accountants. Some prefer working with spreadsheets and numbers because when everything balances out at the end of the day -- you know you have it right. With legal research and writing and document searching, there is no real check to make sure you have the right answer -- you may have missed something big and will never know, or you will find out when the other side discovers it and you lose the case.

4. Hours. Hours vary so much across firms, projects, and seasons, that it is tough to compare hours worked by junior accountants with hours worked by junior attorneys. As a benchmark, most big law firms require their attorneys to work more hours than the Big 4. For example, the billable hour requirement at a Big 4 firm might be 1500 hours, while most big law firms expect 1900 - 2100 hours of their attorneys. The major difference is that accountants usually get more breaks and longer breaks between crunch times, while attorney hours stay high all year long except for short vacations.

Please chime in with your own observations . . .
Tax Changes in Stimulus Bill that may Impact You
Category:Tax Law and Planning
Well, the behemoth stimulus package has passed - what now? And how will it affect you? A summary of the tax law changes in the bill courtesy of JH Cohn.
Economic Stimulus Bill Contains Numerous Tax Changes
On February 17, 2009 President Obama signed The American Recovery and Reinstatement Act of 2009 into law. The legislation commonly referred to as the economic stimulus bill is a close to $800 billion stimulus package that includes nearly $300 billion in tax relief. The major tax provisions are as follows.
Making Work Pay Credit - a tax credit calculated at a rate of 6.2% of earned income up to $400 for individuals and $800 for joint filers applied retroactively to the start of 2009 continuing through 2010. The credit will be claimed either through a reduction in wage withholding or in a lump sum when filing one's tax return. The credit is phased out at a rate of 2% above adjusted gross income (AGI) of $75,000 ($150,000 in the case of joint filers). Employer FICA taxes are not changed.
Economic Recovery Payment - a one-time payment of $250 to Social Security recipients, railroad retirees and disabled veterans (reduces any Making Work Pay credit that the individual is entitled to).
AMT Patch - what has become an annual legislative exercise in recent years; the 2009 AMT exemption amounts have been raised slightly above their 2008 levels to insulate approximately 26 million middle-income taxpayers from the grasp of the AMT.
First-Time Homebuyer Credit - for purchases of a principal residence between January 1, 2009 and November 30, 2009, the credit has been increased from $7,500 to $8,000 and does not need to be repaid unless the house is sold within three years of the purchase. The credit phase-out remains for taxpayers with AGI in excess of $75,000 ($150,000 for joint filers).
New Car Deduction - individuals purchasing new vehicles in 2009 on or after the date of enactment can deduct sales taxes and excise taxes "above-the-line" attributable to the first $49,500 of the purchase price of any one vehicle. This deduction will be phased out once AGI reaches $125,000 ($250,000 for joint filers). Sales taxes paid on a lease agreement are not included.
Unemployment Compensation - in addition to increasing and extending unemployment compensation benefits for various workers, the first $2,400 of unemployment compensation is excluded from income for 2009.
Bonus Depreciation - extended through December 31, 2009 allowing for 50% first-year depreciation.
Sec. 179 Expensing - the increased 2008 limits have been extended to 2009. The maximum Sec. 179 expense will continue at $250,000 and the phase-out will not begin until fixed asset additions exceed $800,000.
Net Operating Loss (NOL) Carryback - this measure was scaled back significantly from earlier proposals. A 2008 NOL can be carried back up to five years (current law permits a two-year carryback) but only for qualified small businesses with average gross receipts of $15 million or less.
Transit Benefits Parity - the current $120 per month income exclusion for transit passes and van pooling is increased to $230 per month starting in March 2009, thus equalizing it with the $230 per month permitted for parking.
Qualified Tuition Programs - for 2009 and 2010 distributions from Sec. 529 plans will be tax-free when used to pay for computers and computer technology, including internet access.
Residential Energy Property Credit - the new law increases the credit from 10% to 30%, raises the maximum cap to a $1,500 aggregate amount for 2009 and 2010 installations, and eliminates the $500 lifetime cap. There are other energy incentives including credits for electricity produced from renewable sources such as wind and for plug-in electric vehicles.
COBRA Benefits - an individual who is involuntarily separated from employment between September 1, 2008 and January 1, 2010 can elect to pay 35 percent of his/her COBRA coverage with the former employer paying the remaining 65 percent. The former employer will receive a credit against income tax withholding and payroll taxes it is otherwise required to remit to the federal government.
To find out how these changes impact you, contact your J.H. Cohn service professional at 877-704-3500.
Lets get Banks Lending - SBA Loan Guarantee Amount to 90%
As reported by NJBIZ, in an effort to get banks lending again, "Starting today, the U.S. Small Business Administration is raising to 90 percent the federal guarantee on most SBA loans and temporarily suspending a fee that is charged to banks, but passed along to borrowers. "
"The 90 percent guarantee will be on loans up to $1.5 million. The portion of the loan above $1.5 million, up to the maximum SBA loan of $1 million, will be subject to a lower guarantee amount. "
Haven't Paid NJ Taxes? Now Might Be the Time
Courtesy of JH Cohn:
New Jersey Enacts Tax Amnesty Program
"New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine has signed a bill creating a 45-day New Jersey state tax amnesty period that will end no later than June 15, 2009. Presumably the program will begin on or about May 1, allowing the New Jersey Division of Taxation some time after the April 15 filing deadline to gear up for the program.
Under the program, taxpayers who pay outstanding state tax liabilities for tax returns due on or after January 1, 2002 and prior to February 1, 2009, plus one-half of interest owed as of May 1, 2009, will not have to pay the other half of the interest owed, nor will they be liable for collections costs or civil or criminal penalties. Taxpayers under criminal investigation for a state tax matter are ineligible for the program. On the other hand, taxpayers involved with civil tax audits are eligible.
Similar to the most recent New Jersey tax amnesty program conducted in 2002, a five percent "amnesty eligible" penalty will be imposed after the amnesty period concludes on any additional taxes found due by a taxpayer that were not paid during the amnesty period for a tax period falling under the amnesty program."
You and Yours Blawg is Moving
You and Yours Blawg is moving its platform over to New Jersey Estate Planning and Elder Law Blog. My thoughts on happenings in the world of Estate Planning and Elder Law can be found there, including tax law happenings. You and Yours Blawg will stay alive for now with reference to business law issues that relate to entrepreneurs and closely held businesses. I appreciate you updating your reader and links. Happy reading!
17 Mayıs 2012 Perşembe
Start at the IRS to Find a Missing Child
I've posted stories before about attempts to get the IRS to provide information about child abductors, but did you know there are parental abductors some who blatantly claim their kidnapped children on their federal returns? The hubris here is astonishing.
Washington Examiner reports:
Hardly a week passes without hearing something about missing children in this country. Some are believed stolen for sexual purposes, some are found murdered, and thousands of other children are kidnapped by one of their own parents.
Today, let's focus on parental abductors.
For the parent left behind after a former spouse has kidnapped their child, there is the agony of not knowing when -- or if -- they will ever see their baby again. Even the tiniest clue as to their son's or daughter's whereabouts is vitally important if there is ever to be a reunion.
To those heartsick parents, I say: The IRS may very well know where your missing child is, but the agency won't tell you.
Believe it or not, there are some parental abductors who file tax returns and blatantly claim their kidnapped child as a dependent!
Some of them apparently need the refund money, while others don't want to attract attention for failure to pay. When they file their return, they list their employer and their home address, along with the child's name and Social Security number.
All are major pieces of information the abandoned parent would love to know. But the IRS cloaks itself in Watergate-era privacy laws, shrugs its bureaucratic shoulders and says it just can't help the grieving parent locate the missing child.
Mortgage Denied: Sometimes, for No Good Reason
Due to tighter standards from Frannie Mae and Freddie Mac, getting approved for a mortgage is getting more and more difficult for average Americans. People are getting denied left and right, sometimes for things beyond their control.
CNN reports:
Banks are reluctant to make loans without the Fannie and Freddie guarantee, and loans backed by them account for just about every mortgage written these days.
In 2009, the agencies lifted the minimum credit score that borrowers must have from 580 to 620. That's probably for the best.
But they've pushed through a host of other requirements as well, and that means real estate deals don't get done, even for some relatively low-risk borrowers.
"You can have one Fannie/Freddie guideline you violate and that gets you rejected," said Alan Rosenbaum of GuardHill Financial.
A quarter of all mortgage loan applicants get denied for loans, according to the Federal Reserve. Many other potential homebuyers never even try to get loans, said Jerry Howard, president of the National Association of Home Builders.
Fraudulent Tax Returns Surge 181%
According to reports, the number of taxpayers attempting to claim inflated refunds was on the rise. When the economy falters people start looking for more cash. And that means more people are willing to “push it” on their taxes. Good luck, when the audits start rolling in.
From Yahoo Finance:
The IRS identified 335,341 tax returns claiming $1.9 billion in fraudulent refunds as of March 4, 2011, according to the findings of an audit conducted by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. That's a whopping 181% increase from the same period last year.
While the IRS has become more effective in its screening process, a weak economy has also driven more people to cut corners, said Tim Gagnon, assistant academic specialist of Accounting at Northeastern University.
"When the economy gets really bad, people get more touchy about how much they're paying in taxes and look at where they think they can push the envelope a little more," said Gagnon. "100 extra dollars really makes a difference to people now."
Many taxpayers tried to boost their refunds or reduce their tax liability by claiming deductions and credits they didn't qualify for, TIGTA found.
For example, the Earned Income Tax Credit, aimed at helping lower-income taxpayers, has been a large source of fraud, with people falsely lowering their income to qualify or claiming children they don't have. The IRS estimates that 23% to 28% of EITC credits are wrongfully paid to Americans every year, totaling $11 to $13 billion.
More here
Trevor at New Zeal Has Done It Again
As Trevor points out, Britain is a test model of how to approach American society and how to punch holes into its structure, like a Urologist testing for cancer of the prostate. He states,
"
Britain after WW2 is their model. While Winston Churchill was the hero of the hour, in 1946 he was dumped in a landslide in favor of Labour Party leader Clement Attlee, on the promise of a massively increased Welfare State and a socialized National Health Service."
Here is a video of how Britain introduce the rationale for Universal Care:
I get all warm inside after watching this cartoon because it is very similar to a Bugs Bunny style cartoon. And everyone loves Bugs!!
Norman Markowitz, from the Communist Party of the US, has written extensively and worked tirelessly for Sheik Obama, He wrote this column with a nod to Newzeal.blogspot.com for pointing it out:
"A “single payer” national health system – known as “socialized medicine” in the rest of the developed world – should be an essential part of the change that the core constituencies which elected Obama desperately need.
Britain serves as an important political lesson for strategists. After the Labor Party established the National Health Service after World War II, supposedly conservative workers and low-income people under religious and other influences who tended to support the Conservatives were much more likely to vote for the Labor Party when health care, social welfare, education and pro-working class policies were enacted by labor-supported governments."
For more information on the "red ties" this administration works with, visit one of my favorite sites called
newzeal.blogspot.com
Oh, and Trevor..keep up the great work you and your colleagues are doing. The Free World depends on it!!
The Rebuilding Of The Hurva Synagogue In Jerusalem
Wall Street Journal
"We permit believers of other faiths to conserve their places of worship. We proudly protect our heritage, while at the same time allowing others freedom of religion," Benjamin Netanyahu said. He added it brings a message of coexistence. It is too bad it falls on deaf ears.
How did the Arabs react when such a message was spoken to them of coexistence? The synagogue's reopening is a "declaration of war, a call for a "Day of Rage."
Here
They refer to the area as "occupied" , which is a total lie. The structure has been in Jewish hands since the late 1600's.
Head of al-Quds international institution, "Dr" Ahmed Halabiya, warned the opening of the Hurva synagogue was part of an Israeli plan "to build a Jewish temple on al-Aqsa ruins." According to Wikipedia, the site has been in Jewish hands since 700 BCE!!
The site is not controversial. The site is glorious in its history and purpose. I plan on visiting this site in the near future when I return. If intolerance and violence is how the Muslims react whenever anything takes place in Jerusalem, the sooner it is completely in Jewish hands, the better. Ask yourself if you will disregard historical evidence, or buy the rhetoric your Left Wing educators and leaders falsely brainwash you with.
13 Mayıs 2012 Pazar
Employers For A Healthy Economy
Checkout this site for a list of their members. These companies many probably haven't heard of but they are small businesses. These companies are upset and organized. I have never heard their voice but feel similarly because I am a small business owner. This site has several press releases which outline the problems the Health Care Reform Bill poses. This is who they are from their site:
"Employers for a Healthy Economy is a coalition of organizations representing small and large employers that have joined together to protect the employer-sponsored health care that more than 160 million Americans rely on to keep them healthy.
The legislation being put forth by Congress will not improve the state of health care. In fact, it will only make health care more expensive for small business, large business and individuals. If we don’t take this opportunity to control the rate of growth in health care costs we are squandering a golden opportunity.
As we recover from the global economic crisis we cannot afford a proposal that will stifle job creation with new taxes, while doing little to help employers and employees cope with the rising costs of health care.
It is imperative that any health care reform measure considered:
Not create a government run healthcare system and thereby undermine private market competition and market-based negotiation;
Not tax employer-sponsored health care;
Reduce the growth in health care spending rather than accelerate it;
Not increase the burden on employers at this difficult economic time."
Please go to the site and watch the videos! And thank you to this organization.
Kill The Bill Health Care Protest | South Florida Tea Party
Kill The Bill Health Care Protest | South Florida Tea Party
NOTE: Sorry I couldn't make it, I was working until 1:30. Something Sheik Obama supporters couldn't possibly understand.
STUPAK YOU DIRTY BALL BUSTER: C-SPAN JUST APPROVED A RESOLUTION NOT TO FUND ABORTIONS
What could the consequences be if the abortion issue is changed in a second reconciliation measure which I expect to come very soon, as the video I posted recently points out.
Well, knowing the idiots in DC, I would conclude that plastic surgery will be covered to continue to level the playing field. Why should the wealthy be entitled to look good and the poor ugly?
Next, vitamins will be up for coverage. Vitamins are preventative in the ever loving quest to control disease, both chronic and acute. There is a vitamin for every single ailment which would supplement outcomes.
Following this I suspect animals to be covered. Fluffy is sick and Vets are very expensive. Fluffy needs care and she is just as important as any other member of the family.
The pet addition will be pushed by PETA, I imagine. After all, they are a Left voting constituency. "Oh frabjous day, callooh, callay", who knew the Jabberwocky had it right. Almost sounds like ebonics.
CAPTAIN AMERICA CALLS TEA PARTY RACIST!!
The writers have always tried to continue this picture until recently when "Cap" believed the Tea Party was a racist venue. Well, I can say that this direction has failed miserably to uphold the value of the character. While everyone in government today is crooked and morally appalling, "Cap" fails to find disgust in these people. The characters which uphold the spirit of America, like the Tea Party people, are shunned.
The character I knew never would have believed this country today. The comic was always rooted in the time with which it was written. In the '40s, Cap fought Nazis. Later, communists, super villains, criminals, and even got involved in Civil Rights. Today, the character should be a Tea Party leader.
In the future, I sincerely hope Marvel Comics takes politics out of its books. If political junk is touted by the current writers, the books will fail to uphold their iconic status. The bastardized renditions already printed have tainted my image. I will never buy another comic unless it's at least 20 years old. As for Captain America, I salute the old version and will miss him sorely. All hail Captain Socialism!!
STUPAK, STUPID-PAK, OR S-TU-PAC: You Pick The Appropriate Term
New site!! Zionist Anticommunist
Great writing and apparently a comic book reader, he has strong positions on Israel and the West. And I agree with all of them. I encourage everyone to read and spread the message.
zionist anticommunist
House Kills Liberty And Freedom: Yes They Can
The passage of this Bill is the death of the American Dream. May G-d and our forefathers forgive us.
Uploaded by www.cellspin.net
The Republicans are interviewed on TV stating they voted against the Bill because we can't afford it, because the Bill is Unconstitutional, and because the American people didn't want it. The Dems say Republicans will be remembered by Americans that they didn't want all Americans covered and didn't care about them.
Really? Where was the transparency promised by the President if he had no fear that Americans weren't going to support it?
No lobby will infect the Bill? Tell that to SEIU and their special cadillac exception. All I saw is secrecy.
No Secret Deals??!!
Oh, this is how Bills are passed and run.
The Republicans didn't vote in a partisan manner: They listened to the people and REPRESENTED THEM!! Looks at the polls.
Rhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Gallup
The Dems say that the Republicans voted against The People, they didn't want coverage for all Americans. That the citizens wanted this Bill. I DON'T THINK SO.....
Not in Augusta, MA
Not in St Paul, MN
Not according to this rally in DC
Not in IN
Or these people
Democratic Healthcare Explained In Only 90 Seconds
Tea party sites are great. This one is not to be missed. Established in Iowa, their site has one well organized group. Everyone involved from other tea party sites can share in the information and get the word out.
Their Site Is Here
These 912 groups and Tea Party groups combined into one tight outfit. They are located in Iowa. If you live there, contact and join for November.
Senator From Texas Is Sen. Sam Johnson: American Patriot! A Laundry List Of The Disgusting Special Interest Deals
Shady Deals and Backroom Bargains in the Senate Takeover of Health Care
Washington, Mar 18 -
“These negotiations will be on C-Span, and so the public will be part of the conversation and we’ll see the choices that are being made.”
—President Barack Obama, January 20, 2008
“The Speaker is trying to pass the healthcare bill without letting America see it first. In fact, she said, ‘We have to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it.’ She’s also shooting for a vote-less passage. That is unconstitutional! Well, I can tell my Democratic colleagues what’s in it. The healthcare bill is littered full of one sweetheart deal after another – from the Louisiana Purchase to the Cornhusker
Kickback. What’s another term for hustling votes? Buying them! The American people are fed up with secret backroom deals in smoke-filled rooms.” U.S. Congressman Sam Johnson
1) “The Louisiana Purchase”
Who: Democrat Senator Mary Landrieu (Louisiana)
Cost: $300 million
Section 2006 provides a “Special Adjustment” for states recovering from a major disaster. Though the state is not named specifically, this provision appears to help only Louisiana – providing $300 million to the state Medicaid program. At the request of Senator Mary Landrieu, this provision was inserted into the Senate bill shortly before it was brought to the floor for a vote. Source: Sweeteners for the South:The Washington Post (November 22, 2009)
2) “The Cornhusker Kickback”
Who: Democrat Senator Ben Nelson (Nebraska)
Cost: $100 million
Section 10201(C)(4) provides that Nebraska, and only the State of Nebraska, would see the federal government pick up the extra Medicaid “tab” created by Obamacare. The underlying legislation expands Medicaid eligibility. Since Medicaid is a program paid for by both the federal and state governments, the Cornhusker Kickback has the federal government absorbing all the extra costs of this eligibility expansion that other states must still pay.
Source: CBO Pegs Nelson's Deal for Nebraska at $100 million: The Hill (December 20, 2009)
3) “Gator Aid”
Who: Democrat Senator Bill Nelson (Florida)
Cost: ???
The Senate bill cuts billions from the Medicare Advantage program – forcing millions of seniors off of their current health care plan. However, Senator Bill Nelson negotiated a special deal that protects Florida seniors from these cuts. Nelson inserted this amendment during the Senate Finance Committee’s markup. Source: White House Cuts Special Help for Nebraska, but Other Deals Remain in Reform Bill: ABC News Blog (February 22, 2010)
4) The Dodd Clinic
Who: Democrat Senator Chris Dodd (Connecticut)
Cost: $100 million
Section 10502 provides $100 million in funding for "a health care facility that provides research, inpatient tertiary care, or outpatient clinical services." The AP has reported that the funding was inserted at the request of Chris Dodd and will likely go to a University of Connecticut hospital.
Source: Health Bill Money for Hospitals Sought by Dodd: Politico (December 20, 2009)
5) “The Hoffa Handout”
Who: Democrat Senators John Kerry (Massachusetts) and Debbie Stabenow (Michigan)
Cost: $5 billion
Section 1102 provides $5 billion for a reinsurance program to defray the medical costs of union members—extra cash for union healthcare plans. This provision was added at the behest of Michigan Democrat Debbie Stabenow and Massachusetts Democrat John Kerry. Source: States of Personal Privilege: The Wall Street Journal (October 15, 2009)
6) “Favors for Fat Cats”
Who: Democrat Senators Ben Nelson (Nebraska) and Debbie Stabenow (Michigan)
Cost: ???
Section 10905 of the Senate bill levies a new annual fee on health insurers. However, the bill provides an exemption to a narrow group of companies due to their political importance to a few senators. This section will exempt Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Source: Concessions Lawmakers Won in the Health Bill: The Boston Globe (December 22, 2009)
7) “The Beantown Buy-off”
Who: Independent Senator Bernie Sanders (Vermont) and Democrat Senator John Kerry (Massachusetts)
Cost: $1.1 billion
Section 10201 adjusts federal payment to states for their Medicaid program. This section provides Vermont ($600 million) and Massachusetts ($500 million) extra federal Medicaid funds.
Source: Democrats Protect Backroom Deals: Politico (February 3, 2010)
8) “Another Joke from Jersey”
Who: Democrat Senator Bob Menendez (New Jersey)
Cost: $1 billion
Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ) secured a $1 billion research subsidy for drug companies in the Senate health care bill. According to Menendez’ website, 86 percent of New Jersey’s biotech companies would qualify for the subsidy contained in Section 9023. Source: States of Personal Privilege: The Wall Street Journal (October 15, 2009)
9) “Coal Miner Carve-out”
Who: Democrat Senator Max Baucus (Montana)
Cost: ???
Section 10323 provides Medicare coverage for workers exposed to “environmental health hazards.” Though not named specifically in the bill, the provision was added by Senator Max Baucus to ensure special health coverage for miners in Libby, Montana. Source: Deep In Health Bill, Very Specific Beneficiaries: The New York Times (December 20, 2009)
10) “The Fargo Freebie”
Who: Democrat Senators Kent Conrad and Byron Dorgan (North Dakota)
Cost: ???
Section 10324 generously provides higher Medicare payments to hospitals and doctors in “frontier counties.” Though not named specifically, providers in North Dakota counties would qualify for higher Medicare payments.
Source: On Health-care Bill, Democratic Senators are in States of Denial: The Washington Post (December 22, 2009)
11) “The Hawaiian Handout”
Who: Democrat Senators Dan Inouye and Daniel Akaka (Hawaii)
Cost: ???
The Senate bill reduces payments to hospitals for treating uninsured patients under the federal Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) program. However, Hawaii’s two Democrat Senators inserted a special deal for their state hospitals. Section 10201 shields Hawaii facilities from proposed cuts in DSH payments.
Source: On Health-care Bill, Democratic Senators are in States of Denial: The Washington Post (December 22, 2009)
12) “The Oregon Fail”
Who: Democrat Senator Jeff Merkley (Oregon)
Cost: ???
The Senate health care bill imposes a new tax on employer-sponsored health plans. Yet Senator Merkley was able to secure a special deal. Section 10901 of the Senate bill shields longshoremen from the full impact of the new tax.
Source: Concessions Lawmakers Won in the Health Bill: The Boston Globe (December 22, 2009)
U.S. Congressman Sam Johnson : Serving the 3rd District of Texas
This is a list of each "sweet deal" the Dems have added into this pathetic bill. Above is the link. Below is the list. I copied it from the site. Therefore, please visit the site and thank him and his staff for being true Americans.
he Democrats' Health Bill Does What?!!?!
Eleven Alarming Tax Issues
Washington, Mar 20 -
From the Way and Means press office: The Prescription Pad
1. Creates a special deal for union members. Starting in 2018, a single union worker in a multiemployer health plan would be completely exempt from the "Cadillac tax" (a 40% tax on high-cost plans) unless the price of that plan exceeds $27,500. In contrast, a single, non-union worker living right next door would start paying that Cadillac tax as soon as the value of her health plan exceeds $10,200.
2. Makes a bad surtax worse. Twenty-two House Democrats opposed
3. Increases taxes on real estate investments. The 3.8% Medicare surtax would hit average, middle-class investors in real estate. A middle-class taxpayer who happens to sell real estate for a significant gain in a particular year would be liable for this new tax, regardless of how low her income might be in other, more typical years. The National Association of Realtors wrote
4. Vastly expands IRS powers. According to a new report
5. Imposes new marriage penalties. Because the Democrats' subsidies for health insurance are solely based on the federal poverty level, if two people make $32,000 per year, they would pay between $6,000 and $10,000 more for health insurance than before they said "I do." This is because as singles they were poor enough to receive health care subsidies, but as a married couple, these Americans are too rich for federal assistance. A discussion of how a prior version of the bill would have imposed these marriage penalties can be accessed here
6. Breaks the President's pledge on not taxing the middle class in at least a dozen ways. The Democrats' health care bill contains at least a dozen direct and indirect tax increases that would break President Obama's pledge not to raise taxes on those making less than $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for couples. These include: (1) a "Cadillac tax" on high-cost plans, (2) an individual mandate tax on Americans who do not purchase government-approved health insurance, (3) an increase in the 7.5% AGI floor for medical expense deductions to 10%, (4) limits on Flexible Spending Accounts in cafeteria plans, (5) increased penalties for nonqualified HSA distributions, (6) other restrictions on Health Savings Accounts, Health Reimbursement Accounts, and Flexible Spending Accounts, (7) a tax on tanning services, (8) an employer mandate tax, (9) a sales tax on medical devices, (10) a tax on health insurance premiums, (11) a tax on prescription drugs, and (12) a tax on insured and self-insured health plans.
7. Ensnares a growing number of people in the Cadillac tax. The Cadillac tax in the Democrats' health care bill would not keep pace with medical inflation after it comes into effect in 2018, meaning a larger and larger tax hit over time. Beginning in 2020, this tax would be indexed by only the consumer price index. Given that health insurance premiums will likely increase faster than CPI, the Cadillac tax would hit more and more plans each year and take a bigger bite from those already covered
8. Repeats the mistakes of the AMT. Instead of learning the lesson of the Alternative Minimum Tax, which hits more and more Americans every year because the exemption level is not indexed for inflation, the Democrats' bill repeats this mistake by failing to index the exemption threshold for the Medicare surtaxes on both earned and unearned income.
9. Forces those with catastrophic costs to pay even more. Current law provides important tax relief to Americans who suffer catastrophic out-of-pocket medical expenses, permitting a deduction for costs above 7.5% of income. The Democrats' bill would raise that threshold to 10% of income in 2012 (2016 for seniors and the disabled). This is a particularly hard hit on those with the highest medical costs who can least afford to pay more taxes. And, according to the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation, more than 95% of the revenue generated from this tax increase would come from taxpayers earning less than $200,000.
10. Punishes investment in our economy. Under the Democrats' bill, the Medicare tax would, for the very first time, apply to capital gains, dividends, interest, rents, royalties, and other investment income of singles earning over $200,000 and couples earning over $250,000. Currently, capital gains and dividends are taxed at a top rate of 15%, but those rates are already scheduled to rise in 2011 to 20% and 39.6%, respectively. When the expansion of the Medicare tax is coupled with the already scheduled rate increase, capital gains rates on these types of investment income, long-term capital gains rates would rise by almost 60% next year - from 15% to 23.8% - and the top tax rate on dividends would nearly triple - from 15% to 43.4%.
11. Robs Peter and leaves Paul broke. The Senate-passed Tax Extenders bill (H.R. 4213, as amended) includes one-year extensions of important tax relief policies for both individuals and businesses that expired on December 31, 2009. These include the deduction for state and local sales taxes, the R&D tax credit, and numerous energy-related incentives. Just weeks ago, the Senate decided to "pay for" those provisions by making "black liquor" ineligible for the cellulosic biofuel producer credit and by codifying the economic substance doctrine into law. Yet Democrats have now chosen to steal those very same revenue offsets - totaling $28.1 billion - to help finance their trillion dollar health bill instead. This begs the question: To the extent Democratic Leaders decide to adhere to PAYGO on Tax Extenders, what new taxes will they raise to replace all that lost revenue?
5 Mayıs 2012 Cumartesi
This Is Senator Johnson of Texas Day! Here He Exposes His CoAuthored Fix To Democrats Secret Deals
Washington, Mar 21 -
Thousands of Americans traveled to Washington, DC this weekend to express frustration with the Democrats’ government-takeover of healthcare that spends over $2 trillion, raises taxes by $569 billion, cuts Medicare by more than $500 billion and increases health insurance premiums. Unfortunately, the Democrats seem content to ram their bill through Congress during a special Sunday session against the will of the American people.
In a last minute effort to try to strip the legislation of its most shameful and destructive provisions, Congressman Johnson backed several amendments in the Rules Committee. Democrats thwarted any improvements to the bill.
Below is a list of the amendments Congressman Johnson coauthored for the Rules Committee:
Protecting the sanctity of life
An amendment to prohibit abortions from being included in the “essential benefits package.” Taxpayer-funded abortion is NOT healthcare.
Protecting the American Taxpayer
2. An amendment requiring individuals seeking taxpayer subsidized health coverage provide photo identification. This provision would ensure that taxpayer dollars do not go to health coverage for illegal immigrants.
3. An amendment that strikes the provision that exempts illegal immigrants from paying the new fine levied on any individual who doesn’t have government-approved health coverage.
Eliminating Shady Deals and Backroom Bargains
4. An amendment to remove the provision which provides $300 million in extra funds to Louisiana’s Medicaid program, a sweetheart deal dubbed the “Louisiana Purchase.”
5. An amendment to remove the provision which provides $100 million in funds for a healthcare facility that would aid only those residing in Connecticut. A provision inserted in the Senate health reform bill at the request of Democrat Senator Chris Dodd.
6. An amendment to remove the “Fargo Freebie” which generously provides higher Medicare payments to hospitals and doctors in “frontier counties,” specifically to benefit North Dakota. A provision inserted in the Senate health reform bill at the request of Democrat Senators Kent Conrad and Byron Dorgan.
Standing up for PHYSICIAN OWNED FACILITIES
7. An amendment that would strike the provision that threatens the livelihood of these award-winning healthcare facilities in Texas and all across the country.
Physician owned hospitals employ 23,000 people on a $1billon dollar payroll and pay nearly $250 million in annual taxes—in Texas alone. But the Democrats want to eliminate these types of hospitals even though they provide top-notch care more efficiently and effectively than many of their competitors.
DEFENDING STATES RIGHTS
8. An amendment that would allow States to opt out of provisions of the bill that mandate insurance coverage or mandate employer-provided insurance coverage, and well as any other provisions that interfere with the ability of patients to privately contract with medical providers and insurers under the laws of the State.
States like Idaho and Virginia have already passed State laws that declare “Thanks, but no thanks” to government-controlled healthcare.
###